Advertisement
premium-icon
basketball Edit

2020 Macadoodle's Mailbag: 8th Edition

GET THE INSIDE SCOOP EVERY DAY WITH YOUR PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION!

Every week, PowerMizzou.com publisher Gabe DeArmond answers questions from Tiger fans in the mailbag. This format allows for a more expansive answer than a message board post. Keep your eye out each week to submit your question for the mailbag or send them to powermizzou@gmail.com. On to this week's inquiries.

KWMizzou asks: Serious question from me, which is rare:What can be done about CBB officiating? The last two games at Mizzou Arena (both Mizzou w's so I don't come off as Bitter Fan X) have seen 158 Free Throws combined!I know Mizzou fouls a lot, but CBB has a serious problem in my opinion. Are there statistics to show that more fouls have been called the past few seasons? I am sure the 12,000+ in attendance didn't pay to watch a FT contest. What reasonable changes can be made to make the game flow better? Giving players 6 fouls a game is fine, but that won't stop the officials from blowing the whistle every other possession. And I am not old and have not yelled at a cloud today...yet.

GD: Here's the thing: It's not all of college basketball. It's mostly the SEC. I dove into the numbers on Monday. SEC games feature a foul per team per game more than any other major conference. There are 350 Division One teams. The SEC has two of the 12 who commit the most fouls per game (Missouri and South Carolina). It has four teams ranked in the bottom 50 and a stunning ten teams ranked below 200. This league is full of hackers.

Now, let me be clear: Officials make bad calls too. Plenty of them. But there is no such thing as "SEC officials." Conferences don't have officials. So these guys are also calling games in other leagues and they're calling fewer fouls. The Big 12 features 3.1 fewer fouls per team, which means there are six fewer fouls in every single game. That's significant. So, yes, the officiating is terrible. But there are teams out there who can get through 40 minutes without sending an opponent to the free throw line 95 times. Unfortunately, Missouri doesn't seem to be one of them. While it would be great to lay the blame solely on the officials, it would also be dishonest. When it happens almost every game, at some point, you've got to look in the mirror and say "You know what? Maybe I foul too much." Missouri's opponents are scoring 27.2% of their points via free throws. That is the second highest percentage in the country (for what it's worth, South Carolina is first in that category at 29.1%). It can't be as simple as just getting screwed by the refs every single game.

As far as how you change it, I don't know. You have to change the way it's called because I don't think you can change the way players play.

jclowe asks: You have probably written a lot about attendance issues over the year.In another thread, firsttiger wrote, "Back in the day, meaning at Hearnes, the bulk of the season ticket holders were from Central Missouri. Sure, there were many like myself, from KC and SL, but not in large numbers. When we moved to Mizzou Arena, corporations became a much bigger target, and we marketed (or relied more on) the big cities."The idea that the Hearnes Center had more season ticket holders from Central Missouri and that Mizzou Arena has more season ticket holders from Kansas City and St. Louis is one I have heard a lot. Is that true? If so, do you know if Mizzou administration sees this as problematic?I remember Hearnes having the Nowell's Rafter Rooters section. When Mizzou Arena opened, there was Cleek's Family Land, but I don't see it anymore. I believe you recently wrote about more that could be done to get tickets to elementary school students in the area. While winning would likely solve all attendance issues, it seems like some pretty basic things could be done to get more mid-Missouri fans to Mizzou Arena, especially on weeknights.

GD: First off, let me say that I don't know the answer to your question. I have no idea where most people who are at games are from. I assume Mizzou could figure that out but even if it did, I'm not sure that information would be shared with me. But it makes sense to me that most people are going to be from mid-Missouri. Basketball is different than football (#analysis). In football, you've only got six or seven games. They're all events. They're all on weekends. You can make a day of it. The game lasts close to four hours so you don't feel crazy spending four hours in the car. In hoops, you've got 20 home games. Most of them are against average or bad teams. At least half of them, and probably more, are played on weeknights. They only last two hours. They're all on TV. Can you make an argument someone should spend four hours in the car on Tuesday for a college basketball game? I can't. Especially for a mediocre team.

In the end, attendance comes down to three things:

1) When is the game? 8 p.m. weeknight games aren't gonna fill the stands. Mizzou had 11,000 against Arkansas, 12,000 against Auburn and then announced 8600 for Ole Miss but I'm pretty sure the actual number was maybe 3/4 of that.

2) Who are they playing? There aren't developed important rivalries in the SEC yet. Of the three best teams in the league, Auburn was the only one to visit CoMo this year. The non-conference schedule at home was a steaming pile this year.

3) How good are they? This is obviously the main factor. If you're winning, more people show up. The more people that show up, the more people they tell and bring with them. Missouri can't put 15,000 in the arena every night, but it can do it on the right nights and it can average 12 or 13 without a problem. But the team has to do its part. It hasn't for quite some time.

From 2008-13, Missouri was 85-4 in games played at Mizzou Arena. That's five seasons. The Tigers lost to Kansas twice, Kansas State once and Texas A&M once. They beat everyone else. Add in a 15-2 home slate in 2013-14 and that's 100-6 over six seasons. That's an average of 16 wins and one loss over six years at home.

In the six seasons since, Mizzou is 57-40 at home. That's an average of nearly seven losses per season...which is more than they lost in the six previous seasons total. Missouri is 11-3 at home this year. It is the fewest home games the Tigers have lost in a season since 2013-14 (there are two home games left; Missouri was 10-4 at home two years ago). There is no home court advantage. It's up to the team to give fans a reason to recreate one.

SEC ENDZONE asks: How many wins would it take for Mizzou to make the NIT?

GD: Mizzou is guaranteed six more games. If the Tigers win three of them, they're sitting 16-16. The NIT isn't out of the question, but probably isn't likely. If you can get four more wins, you're 17-15 and the NIT seems like a pretty good possibility. Obviously, if you're winning in the conference tournament, you're adding to that number. Anything more than four wins will surely get Mizzou in the consolation tournament.

Macadoodle's provides fine wine, beer and spirits in Pineville, Branson, Joplin, Springfield, North Springfield, Columbia and Republic, Missouri plus Springdale, Arkansas. Click the logo above to find the location closest to you today.

CamKCMIZ asks: Bigger question mark and/or concern going into next year- Basketball frontcourt or Football defensive end?

premium-icon
PREMIUM CONTENT

You must be a member to read the full article. Subscribe now for instant access to all premium content.

  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Members-only forums
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Predict prospect commits with FanFutureCast
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Exclusive highlights and interviews
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Exclusive coverage of Rivals Camp Series
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Breaking recruiting news
Advertisement