Advertisement
premium-icon
basketball Edit

2021 Macadoodle's Mailbag: 12th Edition

GET THE INSIDE SCOOP EVERY DAY WITH YOUR PREMIUM SUBSCRIPTION!

Macadoodle's provides fine wine, beer and spirits in Columbia. Click on the logo above to browse their selection and stock up today.
Macadoodle's provides fine wine, beer and spirits in Columbia. Click on the logo above to browse their selection and stock up today.

Every week, PowerMizzou.com publisher Gabe DeArmond answers questions from Tiger fans in the mailbag. This format allows for a more expansive answer than a message board post. Keep your eye out each week to submit your question for the mailbag or send them to powermizzou@gmail.com. On to this week's inquiries.

DrunkTruman asks: Is there even a remote possibility that a contract extension for Zo could also include a reworking of the buyout?

GD: I'm not sure there will be an extension. I know Jim Sterk talked about the possibility a few weeks ago, but things didn't exactly go smoothly after that. It's possible, but I'm not at all confident it's a certainty. I shared my thoughts on it earlier this week.But I think what you're asking is could Missouri sign an extension with Martin and reduce the buyout, or change the dates on which they could fire him. I can't see how that's possible. Why is Cuonzo going to sign that deal? Why would he agree to something that says "You can superficially add more years to my contract but make it easier and cheaper for you to get rid of me?" He wouldn't. If he did, his agent should fire him.

Tedmo_30 asks: I watched Syracuse vs WVU on Sunday. Did you notice Dolezaj play on 4 fouls for essentially the final 10 minutes of the game? Were you aware it was legal for coaches to play their seniors in must-win scenarios w/ 4 fouls? Does Cuonzo know the rules allow this?

GD: Strip away the snark and you make a good point. It's long been talked about how Cuonzo is one of the most conservative coaches in the country playing guys who get two fouls in the first half. And we all know Jeremiah Tilmon has had foul issues throughout his career. But Saturday was the most obvious and the most damaging for Mizzou. And I want to be clear, this isn't hindsight. Plenty of us saw the issue in real time.

GD: Tilmon picked up his fourth foul with 4:04 to play. I understood taking him out right then. He's a guy who has consistently throughout his career picked up a foul, gotten frustrated, and picked up another one 12 seconds later. You couldn't have that. The TV timeout was one dead ball away. So I thought it was smart to take him out of the game, bring him to the bench, calm him down, tell him Missouri had to have him for the final few minutes of the game and then put him back in after a three or four-minute break provided by the (extended) TV timeout.

So the dead ball came with 3:44. That's only 20 seconds of game time. At that point, it was 58-55 Oklahoma and Dru Smith was going to the line. He ended up making both. If Tilmon is back on the floor there, you've got a one-point game and the guy who, to that point, had been your best player on the floor for the final 3:44 or until he picks up another foul.

But Tilmon wasn't on the floor. Oklahoma's next possession was a three-pointer by Brady Manek on a blown defensive assignment. That put the Sooners up four. Whether that happens if Tilmon is on the floor, who knows? A Drew Buggs turnover led to an Elijah Harkless jumper that put Oklahoma up six. Then came what I thought was the most critical possession of the game (and the season) to that point. It ended with a missed three-pointer by Mitchell Smith with 20 seconds left on the shot clock. Kobe Brown fouled Austin Reaves who made two free throws and at that point, Tilmon came back in. There was 2:15 left in the game. Tilmon had sat for 89 seconds and in that time Missouri's deficit went from one point to eight. The Tigers cut it to three, lost by four and Tilmon never picked up another foul.

There were a lot of things you could nitpick in the loss. None of them was more obvious than the 1:29 Tilmon spent on the bench to me. It didn't make sense in real time and it doesn't make sense now.

firsttiger asks: I’m sure this has been addressed, but I missed the explanation. Why were this year’s first and second rounds played Friday - Monday rather than the usual Thursday - Sunday? And will the Sweet Sixteen and Elite Eight also be Friday - Monday?

GD: They needed to allow enough time for testing prior to the First Four once everyone got to the bubble. That meant they bumped those games back to Thursday, which meant they started the first round Friday. The Sweet 16 is Saturday/Sunday and the Elite Eight Monday/Tuesday. The Final Four is on its usual Saturday/Monday schedule.

JT_Mizzou asks: Seems that the transfer portal is central to hoops success over the next couple of years. What day in the calendar year would be a good point to determine if we have the players we want/need from the portal? This is newish and not as well defined as signing periods so I’d like some help understanding it.

premium-icon
PREMIUM CONTENT

You must be a member to read the full article. Subscribe now for instant access to all premium content.

  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Members-only forums
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Predict prospect commits with FanFutureCast
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Exclusive highlights and interviews
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Exclusive coverage of Rivals Camp Series
  • icn-check-mark Created with Sketch.
    Breaking recruiting news
Advertisement